Tell me in a minute
Every country in the world is considering how to regulate AI. Australia is no different. But current regulation is fragmented and there are many different stakeholders who have a voice. This map has been designed to guide you through the landscape of stakeholders, influencers, players and key policies.
The AI Key Stakeholder Map
This stakeholder map shows our current snapshot of the key players who have a voice in the regulation of AI in Australia. We’ll be updating this stakeholder map over time as players come and go.
Our Tier Rankings have been based on our assessment of each player’s interest in AI, the scope of their mandate, and assessment of public statements made by them on AI and the potential impact of their initiatives.
GOVERNMENT
REGULATORS
TIER 1
TIER 2
The Map of Key Policy Influences
This map sets out the current key policies and regulations globally that influence Australian AI policy regulation. We’ll be updating this policy map over time as Australian policy develops and matures.
TIER 1
Canada’s Bill C-27 (AIDA)
Its strong focus on preventing harm to individuals is attracting attention but questions have arisen if it will pass by 2025
TIER 2
OTHERS
KEY INITIATIVES
DISR Key Initiatives
Digital Transformation Agency
Home Affairs Key Initiatives
Attorney General Key Initiatives
CSIRO Key Initiatives
AI Expert Group
e-Safety Commissioner
ASIC
ACMA
AI In Government Taskforce
ACCC
NSW Government
Business Council of Australia
STANDARDS AUSTRALIA
Tech Council of Australia
HUMAN TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE
ANU TECH POLICY DESIGN CENTRE
KEY MATERIALS
Canada’s Bill C-27
UK’s Pro-Innovation Model
US Voluntary Patchwork Approach
Singapore’s Voluntary Framework
Global Partnership on AI
Key contacts
Cheng Lim
Partner
Bryony Evans
Partner
Kendra Fouracre
Senior Associate
Lauren Bourke
Senior Associate
Luke Pallaras
Senior Associate
Want to remain across regulatory change in AI and other data and tech areas?